Un-Maa Saa

Reality Un-Maa Saa

Can angels, demons, ghosts, gods, or unobservable extra-dimensional alien beings be real? Are black holes and quantum gravity real? Do people actually have souls? Opinionated answers exist for all of these questions inclusive of affirmative, negative, and agnostic perspectives yet definite answers do exist based upon realistic criteria that removes all elements of opinion from these matters. As the 'Realist's Bible', Reality is the straightforward science-based handbook for discerning imaginary subjects commonly held to be real and for exposing the dishonest intents of individuals who choose to consciously promote imaginary states of affairs as being real. In addition, Reality introduces the perspective of R-Theory that resolves the so-called problems of 'quantum gravitation' and the 'vacuum catastrophe' while addressing the notion of black holes and providing a proposed quantum based system of universal measurements to be combined with a numerically natural radix and an accompanying numerical system. Throughout its three sections, Reality addresses issues pertaining to both religion and science to bring about a greater clarity of the world. The following is an excerpt from the introduction of Reality. ________ ***There is simply no such thing as having knowledge of a subject that is external to private psychological experience yet cannot be externally detected or deduced since knowledge of any subject external to private psychological experience requires that the subject be detectable outside of private psychological experience in order to be knowable. In short, subjects known to be real have a publicly discernible interaction with the observable world while subjects known to be purely imaginary are neither publicly discernible nor known to be in any way possible. In turn, a Realist is one who affirms the reality of real states of affairs while a Denialist is one who selectively denies or ignores the reality of particular real states of affairs in preference for particular imaginary states of affairs. As such, the notion of a realist differs from the notion of an atheist in that a realist is defined by a natural acceptance of reality while an atheist is specifically defined by a lack of belief in a particular imaginary notion. Being an atheist does not preclude holding beliefs in imaginary notions such as karma and samsara while being a realist does. A realist lacks belief in all imaginary notions, not just one. Since individuals do not actually center their perspectives around lacking a belief in any particular notion, 'atheist' is merely one of multiple descriptions that can apply to an individual whose functionality in life is by no means dependent upon that description. Such individuals are only perceived to be functionally centered upon that description from the restricted perspectives of those for whom a particular imaginary notion is held to be of great significance. That the biblical god is indeed an imaginary notion is by no means an exaggerated characterization or mere opinion of perspective but is a literal matter of fact, honestly undeniable by the distinction of real and imaginary, being a notion not in any way experienced outside of the imagination. That the biblical god had been presented as having engaged in impossible acts of creation that the author of the Genesis 1 creation account had simply imagined yet had nevertheless presented as being actual events shows an intentional endeavor of deceit in operation at the very beginning of the Bible that goes far beyond any mere pious act of ignorance.***